>>Isn't your solution basically rewarding people who knowingly broke the law? What do you do with the ones who have been here less than 7 years? What about the ones who can't afford the fees... give them a choice to leave? And what if they don't? And what about the ones who will keep streaming across the border? If you go after the employers, they are going to be here without jobs. What do you think they'll do in order to survive?
>
>You seem to be criticizing his solution, rather than offering an alternative. Am I mistaken?

Actually I am asking him to clarify his plan. As I see it, his solution seems to be rewarding those who have knowingly broken the law. Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but that seems to be what he is saying. I also do not understand what he expects those who are still coming across the border to do when empoyers tell them they can't hire them.