That may not be what Grady had in mind. He may have been thinking of using VFP as a development tool rather than extending VFP itself. FWIW I have zero interest in the latter. With all due respect to Craig Boyd, Doug Hennig, et al, if the vendor doesn't have enough interest in the product to keep developing it themselves I'm damned if I want to do it for them. Whether there is still commercial potential in using the final version of VFP is another question entirely. I think there possibly is.


>Gee.. too bad someone didn't think of that before. They could call it...oh...I dunno... maybe SednaX.
>
>>This is just a thought.
>>
>>What if there was a series of ongoing projects that unemployed and retired VFP developers could tap into. Perhaps, it could become a company of some sort. It would have to be divided into subgroups of users who own the same version of VFP. There would be freedom to develop and explore all aspects of VFP as the group would have control of what project(s) is developed.
>>
>>Any ideas?