>>Peter,
>>Did you miss the note beneath the table "Some of the above items and "winners" are truly subjective"?
>>To add to that comment: not only subjective but false.
>>Why did you exchange your vcx with prg:( Prg based classes absolutely have uses but IMHO that table is misleading.
>>PS:"Our primary motivator was to enable source comparison and archiving." Check SCCText.prg. It can convert a vcx (and other file types) to a text based version and back to a vcx.
>
>Hi, Cetin.
>
>The Wiki article had no effect on our decision.
>
>We have investigated SCCText at length. There are a lot of problems with the two-way conversion. We will be roughing out new forms visually and then converting them to PRG.
>
>Any idea why the slow build?
>
>Peter

I'm not sure. Might be that vcx already has compiled code while .fxp might not be there yet. I actually didn't experience such a slow down in old/new hardware (it's too much difference).
Cetin