>I need to buy an internal hard disk for server at home. I am looking for something between 300 and 500 GB and am most concerned with performance since prices are relatively close. A larger disk will consume memory to hold the equivalent of the FAT map, right? The server currently has 1.25 GB memory and can go up to 2GB. How big a chunk of memory will a 500 GB disk require?
I don't think your assumption is correct.
I am under the impression that huge HDs require NTFS, and I understand that NTFS allocates it's "map" only as it needs it. So as the HD grows in content it will grow.
As reards consuming memory (I assume you mean RAM) I believe that is a transient thing. I believe Windows will use "all that it can" to meet its immediate needs but then allow it to be re-allocated to other processes as they demand RAM.
Since I doubt that you spend all day only 'exploring' the HD on the server I think your concern is unfounded.
The fact is, you have NO CONTROL (well, very minor control) over how/when RAM is allocated, for what and for how long. But I'd say that Windows today (XP at least) seems to do a reasonable job of memory management. If your performance is good now I wouldn't bother to change the RAM configuration until you see a problem.
By the way, to me the biggest single factor - assuming equivalent rotational speeds - is the number of platters. I will always go for the one that has the higher number of platters.
I make the basic assumption that an HD delivered with multiple platters has all of the platters in use, though it is possible that a specific HD may use only 1 side of a platter. Platters have 2 recordable surfaces but it is possible that only one surface is used.
The reason is simple - platters 'vertically' represent the cylinders of a HD and a HD will always fill 1 cylinder before moving to the next. So if a HD has 2 platters with all 4 sides in use there is twice as much data available to be read (or written) before the heads have to move to a new cylinder compared to one that has 1 platter using both sides. Obviously 3 platters is better than 2.
cheers
>
>TIA,
>
>Alex
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only