Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
After 3 month Testing NET, we are staying with VFP
Message
From
21/06/2006 18:10:54
Donald Lowrey
Data Technology Corporation
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
 
 
To
21/06/2006 06:56:53
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9 SP1
OS:
Windows XP SP2
Network:
Windows 2003 Server
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01130027
Message ID:
01130640
Views:
17
Hi Kevin

Questions:
How many developers, programmers and designers in your organization?

Do you know how much it cost your firm, to get to the point where are just now able to develop small applications? Don't forget to include salaries, benefits, overhead while working on your in house framework. I will take your answer in Pounds or Dollars, as you would prefer.

Since you work for the government, you enjoy less deadline pressure and do not have to worry about whether you make money or lose money. On the other hand, those of us living in the real world have to add lost opportunity cost to the salary, benefits, overhead cost already mentioned when considering efficent development.

As far as code mantainability, with all respect; .Net is not that much easier to maintain. Using VFP 9, OOP, and multiple tier development, modern VFP apps are just as maintainable.

As far as bugs, .NET only checks compiler errors. You still need to build a test harness in .NET, just as you do in VFP. And, it is easy enough to build bugs in a .Net application that are not caught by the compiler.

By the way, chap. We used a commercial framework (MM .Net) which has at least 4 years of development effort in the framework. In in my judgment, I rank the framework as "very good".

- Cheers
Donald Lowrey
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform