>A discussion on another thread got me thinking about what I like in .C# .Net and what I like in VFP. The thought came into my head, that many programming languages, the ones developers really like, were not developed by the mega corporation. Fox Technologies is an example.
>
>So why can't we have a VFP(xx) platform that compiles on the CLR, runs within the Visual Studio IDE? Why not?
>
>Consider:
>1. What if the legacy xbase commands were stripped out of VFP(xx). This version would not run Fox code compiled on earlier versions of the language.
>2. The VFP data engine was omitted, but VFP(xx) was designed to use a backend, such SQLExpress or SQL, mySQL or VistaDB.
>3. It compiled to an intermediate language that ran on the CLR.
>4. The new Fox language remained data centric, within the above constraints.
>
>THEN: Why not include VFP as a .Net language? Microsoft could do this easily. (ARE YOU LISTENING MS?) If you think about it, they kind of had to do something similar to get VB into .Net.
>
>However, I think the opportunity is for a fast agile small firm, headed by a genius like Dave Fulton. After all, the CLR is open source.
>
>Regards,
>Don Lowrey

Don,
This was discussed many times before. I have been working with VFP,C# and (since Tuesday) with IronPython.Net. I was never convinced with the reasons why it can't be, except one reason "it's a matter of resources".
My .02 cents
Cetin