>>>A discussion on another thread got me thinking about what I like in .C# .Net and what I like in VFP. The thought came into my head, that many programming languages, the ones developers really like, were not developed by the mega corporation. Fox Technologies is an example.
>>>
>>>So why can't we have a VFP(xx) platform that compiles on the CLR, runs within the Visual Studio IDE? Why not?
>>>
>>>Consider:
>>>1. What if the legacy xbase commands were stripped out of VFP(xx). This version would not run Fox code compiled on earlier versions of the language.
>>>2. The VFP data engine was omitted, but VFP(xx) was designed to use a backend, such SQLExpress or SQL, mySQL or VistaDB.
>>>3. It compiled to an intermediate language that ran on the CLR.
>>>4. The new Fox language remained data centric, within the above constraints.
>>>
>>>THEN: Why not include VFP as a .Net language? Microsoft could do this easily. (ARE YOU LISTENING MS?) If you think about it, they kind of had to do something similar to get VB into .Net.
>>>
>>>However, I think the opportunity is for a fast agile small firm, headed by a genius like Dave Fulton. After all, the CLR is open source.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Don Lowrey
>>
>>Don,
>>This was discussed many times before. I have been working with VFP,C# and (since Tuesday) with IronPython.Net. I was never convinced with the reasons why it can't be, except one reason "it's a matter of resources".
>>My .02 cents
>>Cetin
>
>And priorities!

Yes:)
Cetin