Hi Tore,
>maybe, if I ever get the time. I was asked the same question by Martin Salias last year, for the UT Magazine, and I promise to give this some priority. Maybe by the time you release a Words version of the help file to WWC, I will have a thorough description of my solution ready. :-)
If you do this, you should propose it to the SednaX folks. Certainly this is one of the things that I find seriously missing in VFP's data engine, although there are 'private' implementations. Lots of people have asked for this sort of functionality over time...
I also think - if done right that's a marketable product.
+++ Rick ---
>
>By the way, you can read a little bit about my solution in thread#
1054612, message#
1054653.
>
>>Hi Tore,
>>
>>Any chance you want to write that up sometime?
>>
>>It seems that this is a feature and concept that comes up again and again...
>>
>>+++ Rick ---
>>
>>>>>>Hi All. I dusted off an old copy of PHDbase :) and tried to make it work with VFP9 but it always gives me an error after creating the index. I know its old and all that but doesn't the UT use this to perform searches? Anyone know if its even still compatible with VFP9? Just curious.
>>>>>
>>>>>What is the version you have?
>>>>
>>>>3.61. Whats the latest and how would one get it now?
>>>
>>>3.61 is the last version Korenthal ever made, AFAIK. My test has shown that phDbase crashes VFP if you have too many records, and I have also found that it does not find all the matching records, even after a reindexing. So for my own personal needs, I created a few functions to get the features I needed.