>Agreed with regards to minor pieces of code in objects being easier to maintain in the form and not in a class, assuming they are one-shots (I have no idea if the problem they were discussing was a one shot).
>
>"Click click - hmm have to make the shape transparent - into the class you go" doesn't strike me as being more efficient. :) Each person has their own philosophy about it I guess though, no one is wrong per se
I wholeheartedly agree with you, Jerry. I do believe that all objects should be in classlibs and we should not be using baseclasses directly. But, I'm not going to create a whole new subclass for simple functionality required once or maybe even twice.
------------------------------------------------
John Koziol, ex-MVP, ex-MS, ex-FoxTeam. Just call me "X"
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" - Hunter Thompson (Gonzo) RIP 2/19/05