>>>What SYS(3054) said about this SELECT?
>>

>>select top 105 trans.cTrans_pk, ;
>>NVL(Employee_Queue_Schedules.tScheduled_Time, {^3000-01-01 00:00:00}) as tScheduled_Time, ;
>>Trans_Employees_Queues.cTrans_Employees_Queues_Pk, 0 as iAssigned, ;
>>space(16) as cCommission_Owner_UsGrLink_fk, ;
>>space(16) as cQueue_names_fk ;
>>from trans INNER join Trans_Employees_Queues ;
>>on trans.cTrans_pk = Trans_Employees_Queues.cTrans_fk ;
>>LEFT JOIN Employee_Queue_Schedules ON ;
>>Trans_Employees_Queues.cTrans_Employees_Queues_pk = ;
>>Employee_Queue_Schedules.cTrans_Employees_Queues_fk ;
>>and Employee_Queue_Schedules.iActive_Flag = 1 ;
>> ;
>>where Trans_Employees_Queues.cCommission_Owner_UsGrLink_fk IS NULL ;
>>and Trans_Employees_Queues.cQueue_names_fk = '5776CF7543564793' ;
>>and trans.cDepartment_Code like 'O' ;
>>and trans.cResolution_Codes_fk is NULL ;
>>and	Trans.iAccount_locked_flag = 0 ;
>>and between(trans.yCurrent_Balance_Amount, 0.0100, 499.9900) ;
>>and Trans_Employees_Queues.iActive_Flag = 1 ;
>>AND Trans.cProduct_Line_Code BETWEEN "600" AND "604" ;
>>AND tExpire_date < {^2006-06-20} order by tScheduled_Time, tDate_Received

>>
>>Using index tag Crescod_fk to rushmore optimize table trans
>>Using index tag Cproductcd to rushmore optimize table trans
>>Rushmore optimization level for table trans: partial
>>Using index tag Ccommis_fk to rushmore optimize table trans_employees_queues
>>Using index tag Cqueuen_fk to rushmore optimize table trans_employees_queues
>>Rushmore optimization level for table trans_employees_queues: partial
>>Rushmore optimization level for table employee_queue_schedules: none
>>Joining table trans_employees_queues and table trans using index tag Ctrans_pk
>>Joining intermediate result and table employee_queue_schedules (Cartesian product)
>
>add
>

>index ON cTrans_Employees_Queues_fk  IN Employee_Queue_Schedules
>

This index exists. We always have indexes on FK and PK.