I wasn't really talking of storage locally, although that is useful too, I was talking about heavy local data massaging and XML and ADO recordsets don't get me excited.
>>You mean like Local Data in .Net?
>
>I have never had a single requirement to store data locally when using .NET - period. Most local meta-data is stored in XML. If I wanted real local data in .NET, I would just use MSDE/SQL Server 2005 Express. I don't really see the issue with this? Finally, SQL Everywhere looks like it may just resolve the "local data" issue quite nicely - time will tell.
>
>Best
'If the people lead, the leaders will follow'
'War does not determine who is RIGHT, just who is LEFT'
