Don't see your posting ??


>>>>And not finding WMD's does not change my opinion that Saddam was a threat.
>>
>>This seems to me to be the root of the whole thing.
>>
>>We obliterated the Iraqi military during the first gulf war. I served in the Marine Corps
>>on the Port of Jubail, Saudi Arabia from August 1990 to April 1991, and I saw all the captured
>>military equipment we took from the battlefields. This equipment was at the time severly outdated,
>>and as I said before, was no match for us.
>>
>>Since there was a UN embargo against Iraq, and we were blockading the country and patrolling the
>>Northern and Southern borders, how could Iraq, 12 years later, be a threat to the US? They were no
>>more of a threat to the US 3 years ago than they were the day after the 1990 war. If anything, the
>>Iraqi military was even more degraded.
>>
>>After 9/11, Americans were filled with fear and hysteria. People were scared and angered, and wanted
>>someone to blame. Bush came on the scene and told the American people that Iraq was involved. Of course
>>people would support an attack.
>>
>>Problem is, there was not then, and does not exist now, and credible evidence that Iraw had either WMD's
>>or ties to terrorist.
>>
>>Again, I refer you to the CIA'a Iraq Survey Group report which did show some low-level interaction between
>>Al Quaeda and agents, but the report shows that they had differences of opinion and nothing ever came of it.
>>
>>Did Iraq hate America? Probably so. Does that justify war? Not in my book.
>>
>>Again, show the evidence