Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Sedna June CTP
Message
From
27/06/2006 08:23:22
 
 
To
27/06/2006 07:24:25
Emerson Reed
Folhamatic Tecnologia Em Sistemas
Americana - São Paulo, Brazil
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
VFPX/Sedna
Title:
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9 SP1
OS:
Windows XP SP2
Network:
Windows XP
Database:
Visual FoxPro
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01131644
Message ID:
01131932
Views:
16
Which uses less code? Your VFP implementation or using My? The idea is that there are many things that are easier to do in .Net. VB 8 implemented My. VFP just borrowed the idea.

>Hi Craig!
>Maybe I can't explain correctly my question because I don't speak english very well, but... here I go!
>
>I've downloaded SEDNA June CTP.
>I'm confused after Doug response to my thread and now I'm trying to understand in wich cases My.Computer.FileSystem.CopyFolder is usefull (by the fact that it doesn't implement progress status).
>I know that COM objects doesn't have a graphical interface, by this fact, is logical that My.Computer.FileSystem.CopyFolder doesn't implement progress status and, at this point, comes my question: today I can use native VFP commands to do the same thing, so why I should use My? Whats the benefits of use My?
Craig Berntson
MCSD, Microsoft .Net MVP, Grape City Community Influencer
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform