>>Matt,
>>
>>No, if refers to FoxPro for Windows 2.x. VFP does not have problems with the current generation of CPUs.
>>
>>>This documentation refers to Visual Foxpro. I am interested in documentation about the computer executing code too fast. I have seen this happen in a Scan..Endscan. (Records are sometimes skipped on fast computers). Has anyone else had these problems???
>
>
>I apologize. The KB Article does refer to Foxpro 2.6. However, I am interested in a different problem regarding computer speed. The following code would skip records when run on a "Fast" Computer
>
>Example:
>
>SELECT x
>SCAN
> IF x.number > 0
> INSERT INTO high FROM MEMVAR
> ELSE
> INSERT INTO low FROM MEMVAR
> ENDIF
>ENDSCAN
>
>Record count of x = 1000
>Record count of high = 300
>Record count of low = 400
>
>This is just a hypothetical example of what I have seen. I know I could use a COPY TO statement here, but the point is that it doesn't work as one would expect. Does this make sense?
Matt,
I skipped FPW 2.6 but still use FPDOS 2.x on an AMD K6 200 (faster than Intel Pentium 200), version is FP 2.6a and never had a problem. Above code also runs correctly. Could it be a CPU bug rather than speed ?
Cetin