SNIP>
>The processes at work are far more complex than what is being put forward, and have little or nothing to do with what man is or has being doing.
>

It is so complex yet you can dismiss man's contribution just like that?

While I appreciate that I am uninformed on the details of the matter, I find it smarter to listen to a large majority of scientists rather than dismiss their warnings because my limited knowledge can poke a hole in their theory. I rather feel that my little poked hole is far more likely to be my error than theirs.

There have been lots of things through my life that I was sure I had all figured out, only to be deflated by the unknown facts/events. This smelled like another one of those to me after a while, so I came around.

I have an innate mistrust of scientists who get their funding directly from industry (coal, oil, automobile, etc) and wonder why it is that most of them dismiss "global warming" out-of-hand.
It truly is unfortunate that business and government have become so influential in the work of scientists and particularly their conclusions.


cheers
>
SNIP