Jim,
Now you are the one being Selective.
BTW there is another latter article signed by 140,000 exact date I am not sure of.

>SNIP>
>>
>>>Does the 8 years age of an article proclaiming scientists signing a petition decrying global warming not matter?
>>
>>In your last post you were saying the article was undated and therefore invalid, please get your facts straight.
>
>No, you're reading what you want to read, not what I wrote.
>The author's article was not date-stamped.
>The article linked to regarding the petition was dated 1998.
>Get it?
>>
>SNIp