Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Iraq and the Elusive WMD's
Message
De
11/07/2006 11:27:32
 
 
À
11/07/2006 10:26:53
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01131121
Message ID:
01135369
Vues:
15
>Republican lawmakers cite shells as WMD proof
>
>Congressional Republicans are at odds with Democrats -- and the Bush administration -- over the significance of 500 munitions found in Iraq since 2003 and recently disclosed by the Pentagon.
> The rocket and artillery shells hold deadly sarin and mustard gas, a small part of the vast weapons of mass destruction (WMD) arsenal that Saddam Hussein built in the 1980s...
> ...To be sure, inspectors have not found the tons of chemical weapons stockpiles {the CIA NIE} had predicted, or an active nuclear weapons program, or continued manufacturing of WMDs. But the NIE contained other components. For example, it said hundreds of chemical weapons munitions remained unaccounted for, after U.N. inspectors destroyed thousands. The NIE did not specify the shells had to be post-1991, so the discovery of more than 500 munitions since 2004 would tend to validate that finding.
> What's more, the ISG did find that Saddam planned to resume WMD production quickly once U.N. sanctions were lifted. He had already corrupted the U.N.'s oil-for-food transactions by bribing foreign government officials and suppliers of prohibited weapons.
> That ISG finding has been buttressed by newly declassified transcripts of taped conversations between Saddam and his top aides. The palace talk: WMD production would be resumed once the West lost interest in containing Baghdad.

>
>The emphasis is mine. Here are some other thoughts:
>1) To play devil's advocate, it is likely that the majority of the weapons found were misplaced at the arsenals they were stored at. Regardless of whether this was due to intential hiding or inept inventory control, the fact remains these weapons were never turned over for destruction.
>
>2) I recall at least one IED that was discovered that included a nerve-gas artillery shell. People are still being killed in Europe by WW-1 era gas shells.

Your points seem to me much like technicalities.
In law, as I understand it, technicalities can be used to free a person, but not to convict a person.
Seems to me that even if Saddam had stated bluntly that he fully intended to resume production of WMD after lifting of sanctions, he likely didn't have the means to do it.

One final thought... I wonder if those musty old gas weapons had a "made in the USA" label on them.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform