Hi Petras.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

I always thought using "==" for comparison caused the SQL SELECT to take longer?? Will just using "=" work for your situation?

The ORDER BY clause may add some time looking at the size of your result set.

Also Browsing table(s) can seem faster since only the viewed records are retreived. Then as you page down the others are retreived.

-Michael M. Emmons

>Hi, the following VFP 5.0a program takes on average 20 secs to read under 500 records. The files are on a SCO Unix server with the "samba" network agent connected to Win95 PC's over a 10MB network connection. A VFP "browse" for the same files and fields is almost instantaneous.
>------------------------------------------------------
>USE "\\unix\disk1\maindata\crd\crdmst.dbf" IN 0 SHARED
>USE "\\unix\disk1\maindata\z\zdna.dbf" IN 0 SHARED
>
>nTIME=DATETIME()
>
>SELECT crdmst.name, ;
>ALLTRIM(pstl_adr_1)+','+ALLTRIM(pstl_adr_2) as address, ;
>ALLTRIM(pstl_city)+','+ALLTRIM(pstl_state)+pstl_pcode as city, ;
>balance,creditor FROM crdmst,zdna INTO CURSOR cdm NOCONSOLE ;
>WHERE crdmst.creditor == zdna.code ORDER BY 1
>
>=MESSAGEBOX("Time:"+STR(DATETIME()-nTIME)+" Seconds")
>
>CLOSE TABLES
>------------------------------------------------------
>Any help would be deeply appreciated. I'd hate to contemplate VC/VB or Delphi.
>
>Rgds
>Petras