Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
To fix or not to fix, that is the question
Message
From
14/07/2006 07:20:09
 
 
To
13/07/2006 18:23:43
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 6
OS:
Windows XP SP2
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01135306
Message ID:
01136332
Views:
13
>Hi Fabio,
>
>>Forgot DO, and uses func(@variable)
>
>also my preference... One situatiuon where I have not found a way to escape Do is in "Do SpecialPrg in prg/app"
>Have you found a way to use the func() syntax other than excessive set procedure manipulation ?
>
>regards
>
>thomas

Hi Thomas,

This way can't exists because the VFP syntax doesn't describe this case.
It is necessary something of the type
filename<separator>func(..)
Honestly (with the very scarce level of the current Operation Systems),
the use of functions in separate files drastically decreases the application safety.

The use of SET PROC it is not advisable,
because it opens the doors to terrible errors.

My design is:
- one "set procedure" only
- many objects for support functions

Fabio
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform