>>>>>As far as the media here are concerned, such movements (like Gush Emunim, IIRC) never existed. You won't hear them mentioned anywhere.
>>>>
>>>>I know. USA's media under a strong self-cencorship. When I say that americans they passionately opposing me.
>>>
>>>You've mentioned this before. If you put the media's of the US and Turkey side-by-side and measure them in terms of censorship, the US will always come out on top of Turkey's. Here is one example. USA rank's is 44th, Turkey is 98th.
>>>
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reporters_Without_Borders#Worldwide_press_freedom_index
>>>
>>>You're accusing the Americans of being biased, but you're subject to a way more biased media.
>>
>>The U.S. 44th in the world in terms of press freedom? I really do find that hard to believe. I will read the URL, even if it is just from the Wikipedia.
>
>Just from wikipedia? Why are you implying it is biased?

No, not that really, even though there has been some press about entries being spun by those with an ax to grind. As I'm sure you know, the founder of Wikipedia has recently stepped in to limit update capability to certain volatile topics. My wariness is more a sense that it's less than scholarly across the board. I am a great believer in democracy but sometimes you want an expert, not the blended input of the masses.

If this is one of the next great innovations and I am a bit behind the curve, as I have been before, I will admit it. Just color me skeptical at this point.