>>>I believe what you are referring to is United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559, which among other things, calls for Hezbollah to be disarmed. Seeing as how the latest crisis was begun by Hezbollah crossing the border, killing some Israeli soldiers, and kidnapping two others, I can see why he would think that's a good idea.
>>
>>Exactly, and the other 60+ resolutions concerning the situation around Israel, yes.
>
>So it's your contention that every U.N. Security Council resolution is a good one, based on sound reasoning, and not in fact influenced by each country's own interests?

When a country with veto power vetoes a U.N. resolution it is NOT a resolution any longer.
You seem to be suggesting that one can pick and choose the resolutions they like EVEN WHEN YOUR OWN COUNTRY DIDN'T VETO. Is that correct? And if so, does the same apply to business rules, to government, to religion, etc? And if so, where does "anarchy" come into the picture?... never?