>>>>>>>>Others have already said what's the offending part: your wish to spread that over others.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I really don't know what that means "spread that over others..."
>>>>>
>>>>>Don't you think that the membership of your particular brand of religion should increase?
>>>>
>>>>I think that would be good.
>>>>
>>>>Do you think that those who think like you should increase?
>>>
>>>If anyone wants to live without religion, welcome. I sure will not send anyone to anyone's door peddling unreligion. It's everyone's personal choice.
>>>
>>>I'd like to see children educated in all manners of religion (including ways of no religion) before they are expected to make any choice about it. I'd like to see a law where nobody should legally be considered a member of any religion before age of consent. Then they'd be entitled to make a qualified decision.
>>
>>Agree. After all, Jesus decided to let John do Him when He was grown up. I would have let my kids decide later, but grandparental pressure forced our hand. I thought (sorry if other religions reading this) "Ah, well, it's the best of the bunch anyway and, unless they turn out to be evangelise bible-thumpers, of go to christian rock concerts and stand there in rapture with their hands held up to the sky, it can't harm them :-)
>
>"Best of the bunch"? Good logic.

And this is implying ...?