>>>Same problem with Naomi answering her messages from 1999 now, and looking for answers for her today's questions in her messages from that year... this time warp thing gets me a little confused. Your sins caused a death two millenia ago? Or were caused by a death then? What's the meaning of "for" in "died for our sins"? Because of? To make them possible?
>>
>>Yes - that is a little confusing...when I say "He did for my sins," I mean He death satisfied God's requirement that I pay the penalty (death) for the sins I committed. Basically, He paid a penalty that I should have had to pay. I believe that He paid for sins past and future - which would have included my sins.
>
>Nice example why I say religion defies logic. Sin per se is a term defined inside the Christian dogma; from this term the whole idea of "punishment" and "dying for sins" follows, the greatness of the self-sacrifice is derived from it, and voila - you have a whole self-contained dogma.
>
>It doesn't even matter whether it's true or not, because it can't be. Its logical value can't be determined: if you accept the initial axioms, it does evaluate to .t., if you don't, it doesn't. I'm not saying the system is complete and not contradictory, because one of axioms is the exclusion of logic, so - it can't be proven nor disproven. It can only be believed or not.


lExistsHell = .NULL.
lExistsHeaven = .NULL.
lWalkedOnWater = .NULL.
etc.