You won't dignify my comments because I bitch-slapped you with facts that you find inconvenient to your argument. It also implies a less than complete and confused understanding of history and that you might be afraid to challenge me in that area - as well you should be if you knew my background.

And to imply I was "drinking" brings to mind two responses: (A) It was untrue and uncalled for and worthy of a personal apology. (B) If true, and I understand geopolitics that much more than you while drinking than that truly puts you in a sorry state, doesn't it?


>I won't even dignify you with direct comments about your reply, since you've obviously been drinking a little. In your other reply you say you don't like to see Lebanese children as victims. But it's okay in Iraq????
>
>Bottom line, there are more and more people who feel like I do everyday. The current administration started off on the wrong foot invading Iraq. This has caused a domino effect creating a very, very bad situation.

It matters little what you or others "feel". I feel bad when it rains. I feel happy when the Marlins win. "Feel" is irrelevent. If your "domino effect" comment is based on feeling then it has no relevance either. We can go back and forth forever, but if your standpoint is based on "feeling" and an apparently ingrained dislike of the current administration, than nothing I say will matter and nothing factual will matter - you will always go with your gut rather than a factual analysis and a historical perspective.

I dislike partisan wonks on the right or left. Because they're shrill idiots. Don't be one of them, Perry. I know you're smarter than that.