Not clear what yo are saying though.
All I want is to get back to the begining of processing in case of falure.
Thre are many calls to other methods between that point and a point of the failure.
>>In my case I dont need to guess what object to get back to. I know that. I am not sure if it would have been 100% safe to jump back to that object from any failure in the program. That's my problem. It's going to be very hard to test something like this.
>
>If instead of direct sql you would use function like RunSQL, then you would know that your select failed and would act accordingly.
>
>Otherwise I don't see a simple way to proceed
>
>say:
>

>try
>  myobject does something
>  some select
>  another select
>  ...
>catch to loEx
>endtry

>
>if one of the select fails, you would be trown out of the original code sequence.
>
>Or what exactly are you talking about?