Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Preventng direct creation of sub-class instances
Message
From
28/07/2006 10:42:14
Cetin Basoz
Engineerica Inc.
Izmir, Turkey
 
 
General information
Forum:
ASP.NET
Category:
Coding, syntax and commands
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01141060
Message ID:
01141110
Views:
18
>>>I tried using:
>>>
>>>  public class BaseObject
>>>    {
>>>        private BaseObject() { }
>>>    }
>>>
>>>to prevent other developers directly creating an instance of the class. I was hoping to sub-class from this and have the behaviour inherited by these classes. Seems that's not possible - in fact I can't sub-class from BaseObject at all because 'BaseObject is inaccessible due to it's protection level'. Any other way to achieve what I need (I don't like the idea of having to put private constructors in all the leaf classes)
>>>
>
>>Wouldn't 'protected' in base do what you want?
>
>Do you mean 'protected BaseObject(){}'?
>That doesn't prevent creation of the object.... :-{
>Thx,
>Viv

Yes but even private/internal ones could be created anyway. Protected/private/internal at least puts some control over it.
Cetin
Çetin Basöz

The way to Go
Flutter - For mobile, web and desktop.
World's most advanced open source relational database.
.Net for foxheads - Blog (main)
FoxSharp - Blog (mirror)
Welcome to FoxyClasses

LinqPad - C#,VB,F#,SQL,eSQL ... scratchpad
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform