>>None claimed any of these views as theirs, so we went ahead and deleted all of them. Now we're in a trouble...
>>For each one of them I ran a Code Reference and didn't find them used. Now it turned out that I probably should have searched for them without l in front.
>>
>>My question is: how can I search for this list without l in most sufficient way?
>>
>>Thanks.
>
>A regular expression with optional l in front v_ follewed by [a-z] would catch all of them (and maybe other unrelated codes matching pattern.
>Cetin

There is a way to use regular expressions in Code Reference, but I'm half way through the list anyway.