>>Hi Jake. You haven't furthered your argument. It is still "two wrongs make a right". Which is an invalid form of argument.
>
>They are not morally equivelent. Hezbollah is attempting to remove a country from the map.

Regardless of Hezbollah's sworn mission, they have no more chance of removing Israel from the map that Mexico has of removing the US from the map. Israel is the middle east superpower. They have won a war against all of their neighbours combined in the past, and they are even stronger today.

>Israel is attempting to destroy an organization that has committed an act of war. "2 wrongs don't make a right" is not a realistic arguement in this situation.

If you are unable to see you are using an invalid form of argument, then it is useful for us to debate this specific point.

> If it was then Israel should never respond to any attack.

I'm not arguing that point. In fact I don't agree with it.