>And this is bad... how?

What I was pointing out is that Conyers not only very liberal, but very vocal. You can spin that however you like.

>>The report was released by the House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff - not a joint committee, but a purely political one.
>
>AFAIK, last few times the Reps were invited to form a joint committee they refused. And even a joint committee would be a political one, you know. It's about politics.

The House Judiciary Committee IS a joint committee. This "report" was published by only one part of it.

>It's a simple step - from "we won't play" to "they're playing alone". Very simple. You only have to forget to ask yourself why did the GOP refuse to play. What did they have to hide?

Or perhaps you should ask yourself why this appears to be a Democrat-only report. Or, more appropriately, a Conyers report (since he apparently is taking credit for it).

>>At 350 pages, I probably won't read the entire missive. A quick glance, though, tells me it is simply rehashing a lot of left-wing anti-Bush propoganda.
>
>I know. You are a true believer. You don't even trust government sources if quoted by the other side.

A little early in the day to be on the attack, don't you think? Despite the fact that I don't trust Conyers, in the interest of fairness I intend to read the report.