>>This is the whole point of how our govt is setup. There are supposed to be checks and balances in several stops along the way. Certain groups of people are doing their best to do away with these pesky little checks.
>
>Oh, really? Must be the really little ones they're going after.
>
>>There are those who are ignoring the similarities to history, and those like Dragan who continually point how they've been there, they've seen this before.
>
>There are those that call me Tim. Regardless, I see very little similarities to history, aside from some very tenuous linkings.
>
>All that aside, you might find this interesting, if you can bring yourself to read NRO:
>
>http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjVjM2M2N2U3ZjJlNTRiZmYzZjJkYzJiN2RlZGQyYjY=

Believe it or not, I read most of it (skipping some of the quotes in the middle, where he mostly re-tells what I already knew), and I don't see this article as anything but "you can't claim you haven't known". Even the monotonous prefixing of anyone involved as "left-wing" (as if it automatically paints them as traitors, which it naturally does not), I think the author simply wrote such a lengthy thing because he felt it deserves that much attention.