Mike Yearwood
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Versions des environnements
>>The help says ALL means all records in the table. The FOR is limiting the records, so you're not doing all. ALL is therefore not required.
>
>O'key Mike,
>I agree with you that All clause is unnecessary,
>but so is clearly.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say. It is not clearer to use ALL when you are not doing all. They can be used together but they are mutually exclusive.
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement