General information
Category:
Object Oriented Programming
Hi!
I will be reading his book and will have a closer look at CLSA.net 2.0 as well.
Sarosh
>I currently don't have any .Net apps in production but if there were I'd say "yes I'm using CSLA.net 2.0" :) I loved it. Honestly still reading the book and trying to absorb. Once I do probably I'll be using 'flying BO' from then on:)
>Cetin
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>I am going to read that book and see what I can get out of it as far as architecture is concerned.
>>
>>Are you using Rocky's (csla.net v2.0) framework in your .NET Apps? If yes then how do you find it?
>>
>>Thanks for your help.
>>
>>Sarosh
>>
>>>I see. I also somewhat like that idea (logic in one place rather than scattered to BO/DB) and working on Rockford Lhotka's distributed architecture (csla.net). But still in that model storage doesn't call BO. It's a long topic (around 60 pages as I remember) just the layers architecture and what/where/why.
>>>If it really is needed as I said before SQLserver has capability to use dlls (and actually SQL2000 already used many external dlls for extended procedures, it just got easier with SQL2005, CLR is built-in). However you're asking this question from VFP perspective and with pure VFP, I don't know.
>>>Cetin
>>>
>>>>Hi!
>>>>
>>>>My understanding is the same (between the UI and DataAcces-DataStorage) the reason why SQL2005 would/could call it is that all that logic is in one place (in the BO)
>>>>
>>>>Sarosh
>>>>
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only