>
>What sort of truce is this??? Both sides "agreed" to the U.N. resolution, but:
>>Israel will stay in Lebanon, until the U.N. peacekeepers are in place.
>>Hezbollah will continue attacking Israel, until they leave Lebanon.
>>
>>So, it seems the so-called truce is quite worthless (at least, until the U.N. peacekeepers are in place).>
>
>It's worthless. Why would
Resolution 1701 work any better than
Resolution 1559?
>
>Unless terrorists are disarmed and a Peace Treaty is signed between Lebanon and Israel as it was done between
Egypt and Israel in 1979, the problem is not solved, and the fighting will resume sooner or later.
I suspect, "sooner", in this case.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)