>>I think in the case of WWII the good guys definitely won Metin. One side was fighting for freedom and the other side was fighting for domination and subjugation of the areas around them.
>
>After world war II USA give a big part of world to Russia and then a lot of country lost their freedom. If USA care about freedom why did that?


You have to read some history and understand the situation and the times. Russia had already taken most of those territories well before the end of WWII. (e.g. half of Poland on the deal Stalin signed with Hitler in 1939) where they also took apart of Romania (Bessarabia), and all of Lithuana, Latvia, Estonia. The USSR fought and conquered most of Finland in the Russo-Finnish War in 1939).
USA had no choice at the end of the war but to deal with the Soviets on equal terms and avoid a further war with them right then and there.


>Why west-world is beginning about freedom the other world sucks?

The West prefers democracy, and many countries prefer to deal with other democratic peoples. You may not agree with the USA trying, in its own way, to "export" the concept of democracy. That's OK. But if you consider that "the rest sucks" (your words) then why don't they change? Turkey did. It wasn't easy and bloodless but you did. Do the North Korean population (or Cuban, Chinese, Saudis, Bangladeshis, or whatever), like the system they have? Ask them.


>Today USA brought freedom in Iraq too?
That's a different can of worms.