>>>>Would you rather have the NAZIs and the Japanese won?
>>>>We already know that war is horrible, but that war had to be faught, and I'm glad the good guys won.
>>>
>>>OK for Nazi's but, we don't know what'll be done if Japans won.
>>>
>>>"Good guys" ? Who're good guys? Some guys killed thousands of civillian with two bombs? Some guys bombed civillians in the Berlin?
>>>Everytime who won the war they're being good guys. Because the others cannot talk after war...
>>
>>There's not much doubt that the Japanese behaved very badly in the countries they occupied.
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre is an example.
>> Rather like the Nazis regarded other races as inferior the Japanese regarded the races in neighbouring countries as inferior.
>
>I'll counter with using atomic weapons on two civillian targets.

I wouldn't disagree with the idea that some things that the allies did in WWII where wrong. But the overall view I think is that the Allies where the good guys and the Axis powers the bad guys.
Also we can't judge some of these actions from our current perspective. WWII was total war not a limited conflict and the object would be to end it as soon as possible. Especially with the Germans ability technically to build long range ballistic missiles. Maybe if the whole thing had dragged on a little longer the first atomic weapon could have been delivered via V3 to New York.

Nick