Now were talking! Just a bit short on the range aspect, but all the other numbers are "right there", except for the pricing, which I can understand the early technology premium.

>They are working on new batteries (actually capacitors) using nano technology which should be able to be charged almost instantly, and hold tremendous amounts of power due to the increased surface area.
>
>http://www.physorg.com/news10525.html
>
>I believe the correct config is an electric vehicle with a small generator for longer trips. This would be recharged from solar panels on your house.
>
>Check out this company (pricey but lower cost models later)
>
>All electric
>0-60 in 4 seconds
>250 mile range
>130 MPH top speed
>150+ MPG equiv
>http://www.wired.com/news/wiredmag/0,71414-0.html?tw=wn_index_1
>
>
>>Definitely closing in on it. The last real impediment will be able to use electric only for higher speeds (65MPH) for longer distances (10-20 miles to start). For a commuter vehicle, that would be extremely attractive. Then they can concentrate on sustained highway speeds (and above <g>) and 5-6 100's of miles, effectively obsoleting internal combustion.
>>
>>
>>>coming soon....
>>>
>>>2009 Toyota Prius with 113 MPG from the factory
>>>
>>>* 113 MPG using Japan's Mileage Equiv, not US
>>>
>>>http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=109981
>>>
>>>>Hi Bob,
>>>>
>>>>I agree, they certainly need to keep trying. It's just the current version ain't quite good enough!
>>>>
>>>>I've read there's a conversion kit you can add to an existing hybrid that bumps the MPG up to 100 but it's several thousand more $$$. If they came from the factory with that capability, and the cost wasn't too much, and the ROI was more like under 2 years, then they'll have something. As it is, they're not yet cost effective.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi Fred,
>>>>>
>>>>>At least the car companies are trying now, I predict that fleet averages of new cars will increase several MPG over the recent past (not because of hybrids). When they do, we need to bump up the CAFE standards while its hard for the auto manufacturers to say how hard it is and how much it will cost.
>>>>>
>>>>>Bob
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>New study shows some hybrids pay for themselves in three years.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,210038,00.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Not unless you got the hybrid version cheap, got a big incentive, drive more than 500 miles a week and gas prices approach $5.00.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>For example:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>NMPG = Nonhybrid MPG 35
>>>>>>>>HMPG = Hybrid MPG 60
>>>>>>>>MilesWeek = 400 miles a week (more than most people drive)
>>>>>>>>HybridPremium = $3000
>>>>>>>>GasPrice = $2.79
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>PayBackYears = HyBridPremium/(((MilesWeek*52)/NMPG-(MilesWeek*52)/HMPG)*GasPrice)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Using the above numbers, it's over 4 years 4 months. And that doesn't even include the probably higher maintenance costs of the hybrid technologies. For Gas at $3.50 and 250 miles/week it's over 5.5 years. And most Hybrid premiums are larger than $3K. YMMV ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Don't forget to factor in the need to replace the batteries after they can no longer be re-charged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I just don't see hybrids as being viable until the cost difference is nearer to zero, or gas goes to $10.