You are correct Tracy, doesn't really pertain to the other discussion because they're not locking up the kid for threatening national security. I just found the story kind of funny and I appreciate the fact that the kid didn't let it rest and was willing to fight for his 1st amendment rights. A small step for a teenager puffin with jesus, a giant step for civil liberties.
>I don't think that example is germane to the other discussions Victor. His example didn't in anyway slander, libel, or threaten the security of an individual or the U.S. as a whole. Did I miss something?
>
>
>
>>
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/03/13/BAG73HMU931.DTL>>An example of the b.s ya sometimes gotta deal with just to say what's on your mind.
>>Might seem funny and ridicilous, but at least the decision was made not to start sliding down that slippery slope.
ICQ 10556 (ya), 254117