>>No this is not the greatest of ideas because of a potential security risk. The problem is that it becomes accessible to the Web Server directly. So if you can avoid that by all means you should.

>>Also, COM+ sounds good but my knowledge of it is limited. Since I've written a complex COM that moves data back and forth via http (accessing Visual FoxPro tables at the website), I'm not sure how much code modification would be required to upgrade this to COM+. I will look into this though since it does sound like you have a lot more control. Do you know a good place (i.e. white paper, etc.) to view differences of COM and COM+ ??

>>There's no change required, but you need to register with COM+.

>>+++ Rick ---


Thanks! I'll try that when I get time.