Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Car colours
Message
From
12/09/2006 12:48:40
 
 
To
05/09/2006 13:20:39
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01150669
Message ID:
01153081
Views:
20
It's simple really. Don't wait, just buy a HUMMER NOW. :o)


>>>>>>>This is completely random.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I saw a bright yellow Aston Martin in Bath yesterday. Definitely the wrong colour for that car . It looked really cheap.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Someone not far from me has a Hummer in that mustard yellow, taxi cab, school bus, color. Really gross.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm not sure there's really a good color for a Hummer. It gets my vote as the most ridiculous vehicle ever marketed as a passenger car. When it was first announced I thought it was a parody ad, a sly commentary on American life. Alas, no. There really is a market for it. I hate to say this but Islamic fundamentalists may have a point about the decadence of American society.
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you noticed that there are apparently no female Hummer drivers? Just a lot of middle aged guys with way more money than sense or taste.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I don't Mike. I heard a while back from one of those car radio shows that if you consider everything, a Hummer may be more environmental friendly then the Toyota Prius, from birth to grave. Let me see I can find that transcript any where.
>>>
>>>Those 'birth to grave' arguments are, in my opinion, used only when the obvious "battle" is lost and obfuscation is required to cast *some* doubt. To me they are crap of the first order 95% of the time.
>>>
>>>I have a friend who insists that 'birth to grave' is the ONLY proper argument, and he then concludes that USED is the only legitimate purchase and the OLDER THE BETTER. His conviction is that no new car need be made at all while they're (basically) all similar in terms of environmental/fossil fuel characteristics.
>>>He argues that ethanol is a stupid idea (if people only knew hoe much energy it takes to produce the stuff). Same, he argues, for hydrogen. When I counter with 'well if solar or wind were used in production of either your argument goes out the window' he says "Sure, when someone actually does that".
>>>
>>>My take is quite simpler... if there's consensus that something is environmentally friendly then go with it if you can. Waiting for perfection only kills chances to achieve perfection.
>>
>>
>>I was listening to the radio when my wife was looking for a car a few weeks back. And I thought I heard it on the show. I guess I could have misunderstood.....
>
>I doubt very much that you misunderstood. I've heard like arguments here too on various things. I'm just saying that the arguments are designed to confuse and cast doubt rather than provide anything actually factual or relevant to the real situation.
>When you've only got lemons you tell people that the lemons are real good. You try to convince them that there's far fr more at play that just the obvious stuff.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform