Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Old SF - Their lack of forethought
Message
De
13/09/2006 14:34:32
 
 
À
13/09/2006 12:55:53
Information générale
Forum:
Books
Catégorie:
Science fictions
Divers
Thread ID:
01152743
Message ID:
01153473
Vues:
18
>>>>>>>>...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Along the lines of this thread.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In one Aurthur C. Clarks books, he once wrote something along the lines of...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>First man: "Did you see that laser?" As he look out the porthole of the spaceship.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Second man sitting: "That is rubbish. You can't see lasers in space. That only occurs in bad SF books."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I think Dragan mentioned that in a previous discussion ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I seem to recall Dragan was talking about sound - the great explosions we hear in all the SF movies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And the great invention of Hollywood/StarTrek/whoever: slow light. I know Discworld light is taking its time, but actually seeing light travel slower than a bullet is really something. On a video at probably 30 fps, it usually takes three images for a beam of light to travel from the phaser's muzzle to the target's guts. Which is still below 1 km/s, and faaaaar below c.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ha ha! I checked THAT one out myself! And thought "light - that you can dodge (and more easily than a bullet in that you can see it coming")
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I like that. See the light coming. For to see the light coming, then one actually sees the light. That is a paradox.
>>>
>>>Maybe in YOUR universe ????
>>
>>It's MY universe. Cool.
>>
>>A old friend of mine use to say often. "If you don't like my opinion, then get the H#ll out my universe."
>
>So THAT's when you came over to ours!? Oh, I see now! :-)

OURS, I thought it was mine. I see it, it must be mine. :-)

Time is the only thing that is relative. For as we all know, it takes about a thousand of second for the signal to travel from our eyes to our brain and then to be processed. Therefore we are all living in the past.
Greg Reichert
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform