>How different is a “preemptive attack” from a terrorist attack? Time to rationalize. To rationalize is to have dialogue without truthful intent.
>
>If we had to attack someone because of 9-11, why Iraq? How about England? England has a lot of terrorists and a history of terrorism. Spain would be a good candidate for a “preemptive attack”. Don’t forget France and Germany.
Actually, in the period just post 9/11, during Bush's War on Terror, "you're either with us or agin us" speech, I seem to recall that the UK technically could be on his hitlist.
...
- Whoever said that women are the weaker sex never tried to wrest the bedclothes off one in the middle of the night
- Worry is the interest you pay, in advance, for a loan that you may never need to take out.
