>In Kevin's defense, I think he was talking more about taking out the governments, and not the physical countries or peoples. Not genocide. Even the Turks weren't able to eliminate all the Armenians (although they put a lot of effort into it.
>
>Thanks, that IS what I'm talking about. Obviously, a large-scale attack would affect innocent civilians, and sadly there is no way around that. However, nations like Iran that promote and fund terrorist activities are the ones ultimately putting their citizens at risk. And I'll repeat what I've said here before - we've been justified since 1979 in bombing Tehran and taking out their government.
>

This is what you said - "all that matters is that the sooner Tehran is turned into a parking lot, the better off we'll all be". Not take out the government but turning "Tehran into a parking lot". You also suggested the use of nuclear weapons. You don't take out a handful of people with nuclear weapons. Perhaps you need to be clearer.