If the people in a Democracy elect politicians who incorporate changes in our laws which appear to coincide with religious beliefs - that is the nature of a Democracy. Legislature should represent the will of the people as long as the consitution and bill of rights are not trampled on in the process. It in fact simply demonstrates that either those with religious beliefs are predominent in the states or they are the ones who vote.

All in all, we still have separation of church and state.


>>>...is already dismantled. I don't see it having too many teeth left.
>>
>>I'm curious as to how you've reached that conclusion. It seems to be working just fine to me.
>
>"Seems" is the keyword.
>
>>>Sloba killed nobody. Others did that. He was still responsible for pushing/enticing them.
>>
>>Which hardly turns into Islamics seeing the West and playing "me too, me too" when pushing for religious law.
>
>Did I say that? It's a known fact that islamic tradition puts the judiciary in the hands of priests. I keep saying that they are handed a "they do it too" argument to silence the dissenters.