>>Rubbish...
>>
>>Not in all islamic countries they will stone people....
>>
>>And yes, you ignore to what I've been saying here. I've made my standpoint clear, but I respect other countries to have a different.
>>
>>And for the fact of weaseling, you changed the topic, not me.

>I challenge you again to answer the question.

This question? >>>No, Walter, what clear is that you are ignoring the reality of sharia as it gets put into practice. Read your own Wikipedia citation, and tell me: is that the kind of thing you'd be okay with having imposed in your country, even if just for Muslims?

Sigh... I wish you read and understand messages, but that seems a real problem with you huh...?

Did you read about the toronto proposal? I personally don't agree with that, unless there is a good reason for it. It has to solve a purpose. So:

- IF there is a good reason for implementing it.
- AND If you can voluntarely weigh issues under Sharia
- AND If people have the possibility to escalate the issue to national law
- AND If the implemented sharia does not violate the general law

I can see why people take a look at it. Again, I don't agree with it anyways as there are dangers attached to it (not for the natives, but for the one participating) that have to be examined. This was more or less the Toronto proposal, but did not get implemented because of change of government and the resistance out of the Muslim community itself. That finnally killed it.

>No, I did not change the subject.

Look at the title. It is about the end of iraq as shown in the video. And you changed the topic to the sharia. I did open this discussion about the sharia.

>I posted a rebuttal to you, and also posted an additional link to illustrate that you have issues of your own (as a nation) to worry about. So sorry you got distracted.

This is because you don't know what the issue is. You saw something going on in holland that you don't understand in the first place. I already explained that it was misintepreated and it was an example of Democracy (as was explained and accepted by our government). Your blind tactic to imply I have nothing to say about this, because you think I've got other worries is insulting and does not respect of much understanding of how the world works.

It shows some deeper urge of you to attack every political message of me regardless of the contents with a counter attack, whether or not it has something to with the topic or not. Now THAT IS CALLED WEASELING ......