You'll have to read the law Dragan. There is a definite difference. It cannot be any oath for it to be perjury. Howefver, that is why he should be under investigation for Impeachment - breaking the rule of law, not lying under oath - perjury is only applicable when under the oath testifying before federal courts and grand juries. Otherwise you are referring to unsworn falisificaiton to authorities - not to the American people still. HOwever, there are a few things he has done (still must be proven) that fall into the category of breaking the rule of law and abusing his powers which qualify for impeachment proceedings.


>>>- the President was caught lying several times and still isn't called in front of any commission. Remember what Clinton's impeachment was about?
>>
>>Lying under oath which is perjury
>>
>>Not the same thing at all. Citizens go to prison for that - many are there now.
>>
>>If President Bush is called to the carpet for lying while in the office of Presidency, well then there goes our entire history of the Presidency...
>>
>>However, President Bush should go to trial for impeachment for abusing the powers of the presidency and threatening the rule of law. I find it amazing that it has not happened yet.
>
>Technically, a president is under some oath the whole term. Doesn't he or she swear to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law?