>>>>>>>Can you provide an example of where honey worked with terrorists? Where the country is not a target of terrorism now because of that tactic? Where the country did not basically placate the terrorists (give in to them) and that country is not now an immediate target because another larger target is more important?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The UK neutralized the IRA terrorists by negotiating with them. That's a clear case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The problem I have with using honey is that terrorism will work. It will achieve its goal. As long as bigger more important immediate targets exist, honey may suffice. What happens when a larger more immediate target no longer exists? Won't the terrorists move on to the smaller less important targets? In the past that has been the case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The IRA have ceased all operations as a terrorist organization.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>IRA is mostly known as Christians.... What we're dealing with now are, say it with me, ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALIST/FASCIST/EXTREMIST/TERRORIST
>>>>
>>>>She didn't say Islamic terrorist above.
>>>
>>>I thinmk it would be safe to assume that it was implied since in her second paragraph in her reply to Jim, she clearly is talking about "them".
>>
>>I think she was just using Islamic terrorists as one example for that point.
>
>What is another major terrorist group. What other terrorist group have dominated the word news the last decade?

The Republicans?