>>>I usually agree with you, but not in this case. For one thing the story is all over the news, so you can't say it has been hushed up. I also don't think there is anything about Republicans that makes them more likely to be sexual predators than anyone else. Kind of a cheap shot IMO.
>>
>>Well it was hushed up for many months before it saw the sunshine.
>>
>>But I do agree that party affiliation has little to do with social deviance. Though I'd bet that MBAs, deviants+, are mainly Republicans.
>
>MBAs? Maybe the acronym means something different from what I am thinking of, which is people with Management in Business Administration degrees. I have no doubt they are predominantly Republican but don't get the link to sexual deviants.
No, SOCIAL deviance (of MBAs).
These guys/gals training, backed up by law, is that the only thing that matters is shareholder equity and any social/societal implications of decisions they make are to be NIL if it changes the equity position negatively in any way.
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement