>>>>>I've done it, and ... Hey! it's quite easy!
>>>>>1. Create a tag REPCODE on the child table
>>>>>2. Create the relationship with Master.repcode -> Child.REPCODE
>>>>>3. Set the active tag in the child table to REPCODE+ZIPCODE
>>>>>
>>>>>There you are...
>>>>>
>>>>>HTH, Alex
>>>>
>>>>Alex,
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the reply. The solution you suggest is the way I
>>>>have tried many times. Are you sure you have actually done
>>>>this ?? My experience has been that unless the TAG is created
>>>>with the exact field described in the RELATION, that it does
>>>>not work. I will try it again but I have little confidence
>>>>in the result. Thanks again.
>>>
>>>Yes I've done it successfully... But I don't think you've read item N.1 carefully...
>>
>>What do you mean by item N.1 ? I will read ANYTHING which
>>will shed some light on this.
>
>Item No. 1 says: "Create a tag REPCODE on the child table". Wich means that you really have to create the tag on the child table...

AHA !!! I may have seen the light ! Let me see if I have
the right idea .... I need to create Two (2) tags on the child
table: repcode and repcode+zipcode. Set a relationship of
parent.repcode with child.repcode and then set the active tag
for the child table as repcode+zipcode. I didn't realize
I could have two different tags on the child table functioning
at the same time. But if so, it is ok by me.