>Not really unconditional then is it (although I agree that that was one of the cease-fire agreements but I didn't get the use of unconditional in that agreement since it wasn't any such thing)?

That's why I added an exclamation mark to my 'question'. Seemed to me the soldiers should have been basking on the beach the day the cease-fire came into effect.
I simply concluded that once again the Middle East interprets things differently than (what I believe to have been) plain-stated language.


>
>
>
>>>I was worried that they might be there for years.
>>>
>>>"Israel’s Army pulled out of southern Lebanon early on Sunday to complete a transfer to the Lebanese Army and international peacekeepers under a United Nations resolution to end the bloody war with Hezbollah guerrillas."
>>>
>>>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/01/world/middleeast/01israel.html
>>
>>I wonder if that will unconditionally get them their soldiers back, as the cease-fire stated.?!