Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Server / refresh problem
Message
From
02/10/2006 17:26:37
 
 
To
02/10/2006 15:25:31
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01158536
Message ID:
01158694
Views:
24
I just realize that, too bad, because they have told me that they have set all settings that I gave them from your list.

I should have checked that very carefully myself.

>Deja Vu - I just noticed that those settings were in a message to you previously.
>
>I was reading your messages and I missed any mention of Novell previously. You may want to look at:
>
>Message #1154759
>
>I posted common Novell settings for networks using VFP and VFP databases.
>
>
>
>>We found the setting that caused that behavior. In Novell client, the default for File Caching is On. I think this is the default setting.
>>
>>After setting File Caching = Off, everything worked fine. Same for both computers.
>>
>>They are using the latest Novell Client for XP.
>>
>>
>>>This is definetively caused by some configuraton error on your system! Some cache setting or delayed write
>>>may cause strange thimns to happen. And check Flush in help!
>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>I have had several issues with index corruptions and wrong unique keys. Now I have seen that the reason for these problems is how VFP reads the data on the network on two particular machines (XP).
>>>>
>>>>The following scenario:
>>>>*-- Machine 1:
>>>>USE N:\Cinema\PrimKey
>>>>?prNumber && returns 11600
>>>>
>>>>*-- Machine 2:
>>>>USE N:\Cinema\PrimKey
>>>>?prNumber && Shows 11610
>>>>REPLACE prNumber WITH 11611
>>>>?prNumber && Shows 11611
>>>>
>>>>*-- Machine1:
>>>>?prNumber && still shows 11600 !
>>>>
>>>>In fact, machine 1 does not show the updated numbers, until I reboot the entire computer. After reboot, VFP reads the updated values, but then again stucks on those values until rebooted.
>>>>
>>>>Only VFP has that problem, when accessed with another program, the values are uptodate.
>>>>
>>>>What could be the reason for that and how can I solve that?
>>>>
>>>>I tried SET REFRESH TO 1, Flush IN after every replace, and do record lock (and sometimes file lock) whenever appropriate.
>>>>
>>>>Thank you for your help in advance.
Christian Isberner
Software Consultant
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform